Hi Grant,
> On Jun 7, 2015, at 14:16 , Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300
> , Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Wolfram,
>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Pantelis,
>>>
>>> thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait
Hi Grant,
On Jun 7, 2015, at 14:16 , Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300
, Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com
wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
thanks for
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:50:26 +0300
, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Sunday 07 June 2015 12:16:32 Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > > > On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Pantelis,
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:50:26 +0300
, Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com
wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Sunday 07 June 2015 12:16:32 Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Sunday 07 June 2015 12:16:32 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > > On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pantelis,
> > >
> > > thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
> > >
Hi Grant,
On Sunday 07 June 2015 12:16:32 Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300
, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> > On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pantelis,
> >
> > thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
> > access the test system again.
> >
>
> [snip]
>
>
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300
, Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com
wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
access the test system
> This patch has been posted before but up to now, no-one had a test case that
> triggered
> the bug,
At your service... ;)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Wolfram,
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 11:33 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>
>> Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
>> patch?
>>
>> I have a hunch this might be the problem.
>
> Yeah, this even makes my more complex driver work \o/ I will post it
> once -rc1 is
> Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
> patch?
>
> I have a hunch this might be the problem.
Yeah, this even makes my more complex driver work \o/ I will post it
once -rc1 is out. Thanks a lot for your help, much appreciated!
signature.asc
Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
patch?
I have a hunch this might be the problem.
Yeah, this even makes my more complex driver work \o/ I will post it
once -rc1 is out. Thanks a lot for your help, much appreciated!
signature.asc
Description:
This patch has been posted before but up to now, no-one had a test case that
triggered
the bug,
At your service... ;)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Wolfram,
On Apr 23, 2015, at 11:33 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
patch?
I have a hunch this might be the problem.
Yeah, this even makes my more complex driver work \o/ I will post it
once
Hi Wolfram,
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> Hi Pantelis,
>
> thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
> access the test system again.
>
[snip]
Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
patch?
I have a
Hi Wolfram,
On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
access the test system again.
[snip]
Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
Hi Pantelis,
thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
access the test system again.
> > + struct property status_chg = { .name = "status", .length = 9, .value =
> > "disabled" };
> > + int ret;
> > +
>
> ^ The status_chg property is on the stack. You can’t
Hi Pantelis,
thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
access the test system again.
+ struct property status_chg = { .name = status, .length = 9, .value =
disabled };
+ int ret;
+
^ The status_chg property is on the stack. You can’t do that,
Hi Wolfram,
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 18:12 , Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> I wanted to disable a node via OF_DYNAMIC by setting its status to disabled.
> This code is the minimal testcase, the same happens in a more complex
> scenario.
> There is something wrong with freeing
From: Wolfram Sang
I wanted to disable a node via OF_DYNAMIC by setting its status to disabled.
This code is the minimal testcase, the same happens in a more complex scenario.
There is something wrong with freeing resources. Is my module wrong? Or is it a
bug? Crashlog without
From: Wolfram Sang wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com
I wanted to disable a node via OF_DYNAMIC by setting its status to disabled.
This code is the minimal testcase, the same happens in a more complex scenario.
There is something wrong with freeing resources. Is my module wrong? Or is it a
bug?
Hi Wolfram,
On Mar 31, 2015, at 18:12 , Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
From: Wolfram Sang wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com
I wanted to disable a node via OF_DYNAMIC by setting its status to disabled.
This code is the minimal testcase, the same happens in a more complex
scenario.
22 matches
Mail list logo
