Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2008-02-08 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:39:26 + Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of > > those > > versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2008-02-08 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:39:26 + Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-03 Thread Ben Dooks
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be > > bothered to follow > > the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-03 Thread Matt Porter
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered > to follow > the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can > be supported. > Then they can have some voodoo front-end to

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-03 Thread Matt Porter
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported. Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-03 Thread Ben Dooks
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:27:06 -0800 Vitaly Luban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kernel "pci_ids.h" file has data for that card missing. > > Also, Ellen needs some control bits flipped before it functions properly > as SDIO controller by the spec. > Should apply clenly to Linus and Drzeus trees.

[PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-01 Thread Vitaly Luban
Kernel "pci_ids.h" file has data for that card missing. Also, Ellen needs some control bits flipped before it functions properly as SDIO controller by the spec. Should apply clenly to Linus and Drzeus trees. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Luban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

[PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-01 Thread Vitaly Luban
Kernel pci_ids.h file has data for that card missing. Also, Ellen needs some control bits flipped before it functions properly as SDIO controller by the spec. Should apply clenly to Linus and Drzeus trees. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Luban [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support

2007-12-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:27:06 -0800 Vitaly Luban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kernel pci_ids.h file has data for that card missing. Also, Ellen needs some control bits flipped before it functions properly as SDIO controller by the spec. Should apply clenly to Linus and Drzeus trees. Please