From: Andi Kleen
gcc 5 supports a new -mcount-record option to generate ftrace
tables directly. This avoids the need to run record_mcount
manually.
Use this option when available.
It also has a -mcount-nop option to generate the mcount calls
as nops. So far that is not implemented, but it could
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:19:58 +0300
Kalle Valo wrote:
> Steven Rostedt writes:
>
> > I wonder who's responsible for
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/
> >
> > If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for gcc5 I'll be happy to download
> > it and test this patch.
>
> Fou
Steven Rostedt writes:
> I wonder who's responsible for
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/
>
> If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for gcc5 I'll be happy to download
> it and test this patch.
Found this:
"For any questions don't hesitate to contact me at tony (at) ba
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:54:12 +0200
Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > I wonder who's responsible for
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/
> > > >
> > > > If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for gcc5 I'll be happy to download
> > > > it and test this patch.
> > >
> > > Tha
> > > I wonder who's responsible for
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/
> > >
> > > If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for gcc5 I'll be happy to download
> > > it and test this patch.
> >
> > That doesn't make any sense.
> >
>
> What, adding gcc5 to the crosstoo
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:55:08 -0700
Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Interesting. But I can't accept this until I can test it. I don't have
>
> AFAIK that's a unique policy. I don't think any other maintainer operates
> this way.
Um, really? Other maintainers don't test patches that they maintain?
This isn
> Interesting. But I can't accept this until I can test it. I don't have
AFAIK that's a unique policy. I don't think any other maintainer operates
this way.
> I wonder who's responsible for
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/
>
> If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:54:27 -0700
Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> gcc 5 supports a new -mcount-record option to generate ftrace
> tables directly. This avoids the need to run record_mcount
> manually.
>
> Use this option when available.
>
> It also has a -mcount-nop option to genera
From: Andi Kleen
gcc 5 supports a new -mcount-record option to generate ftrace
tables directly. This avoids the need to run record_mcount
manually.
Use this option when available.
It also has a -mcount-nop option to generate the mcount calls
as nops. So far that is not implemented, but it could
9 matches
Mail list logo
