On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Also, the proposed solution might hide some other important errors. We may
>>> need
>>> to terminate transfers when we found that an error is there in last
>>> transfers:
>> I think it could be better than first solution, but what do you
Hi Andy,
Adding blank lines before and after your replies makes it more readable.
On 16 October 2012 15:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM, viresh kumar
> wrote:
>> Can you try with a large timeout value for the module.
> I tried and the failures were gone.
Ok. So t
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM, viresh kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>> The following error messages come if we have software LLP emulation enabled
>> and
>> enough threads running.
>>
>> modprobe dmatest iterations=40
>> [ 168.048601] dmatest: Start
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> The following error messages come if we have software LLP emulation enabled
> and
> enough threads running.
>
> modprobe dmatest iterations=40
> [ 168.048601] dmatest: Started 1 threads using dma0chan0
> [ 168.054546] dmatest: Started 1
The following error messages come if we have software LLP emulation enabled and
enough threads running.
modprobe dmatest iterations=40
[ 168.048601] dmatest: Started 1 threads using dma0chan0
[ 168.054546] dmatest: Started 1 threads using dma0chan1
[ 168.060441] dmatest: Started 1 threads using
5 matches
Mail list logo
