Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:06:45PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > list. > > A meta-schema check for this is pending once these existing cases are >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-23 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Rob, > > With one comment below, > > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg > > > > > --- > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/renesas,usbhs.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/renesas,usbhs.yaml > > > index 737c1f47b7de..54c361d4a7af 100644 > > > ---

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-23 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:54:26AM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:39 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:06:45PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > > > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > > > preferred

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-23 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:39 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:06:45PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > > list. > >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:06:45PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > list. Acked-by: Mark Brown signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-22 Thread Jassi Brar
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:10 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > list. > > A meta-schema check for this is pending once these existing cases are > fixed. > >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-22 Thread Vinod Koul
On 21-12-20, 21:06, Rob Herring wrote: > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > list. > > A meta-schema check for this is pending once these existing cases are > fixed. > --- >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, Thank you for the patch. On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:06:45PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > list. > > A meta-schema check for this is pending

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-21 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Rob, On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:06:45PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > 'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is > preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' > list. > > A meta-schema check for this is pending once these existing cases

[PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop redundant maxItems/items

2020-12-21 Thread Rob Herring
'maxItems' equal to the 'items' list length is redundant. 'maxItems' is preferred for a single entry while greater than 1 should have an 'items' list. A meta-schema check for this is pending once these existing cases are fixed. Cc: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Vinod Koul Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Greg