Hi Chanwoo,
On Thursday 10 April 2014 09:19 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> On 03/28/2014 03:51 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> commit ca488 (extcon: of: Remove unnecessary function call by using the
>> name of device_node) started using node name instead of device name
>> to get th
Hi Kishon,
On 03/28/2014 03:51 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> commit ca488 (extcon: of: Remove unnecessary function call by using the
> name of device_node) started using node name instead of device name
> to get the extcon device. This breaks dwc3-omap since it's not able to
> get the extcon
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:21:02PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> commit ca488 (extcon: of: Remove unnecessary function call by using the
> name of device_node) started using node name instead of device name
> to get the extcon device. This breaks dwc3-omap since it's not able to
> get the
commit ca488 (extcon: of: Remove unnecessary function call by using the
name of device_node) started using node name instead of device name
to get the extcon device. This breaks dwc3-omap since it's not able to
get the extcon device anymore. Fixed it by setting edev name of
palmas to be the same as
4 matches
Mail list logo