On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:02:01PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> >Am I right in thinking you have three unrelated patches here?
> >
> I don't think so but you may be right nonetheless if my opinion.
The point is: the way we do development here is to break things down
into a series of simple,
Hi Matt,
sorry for not answering your questions in the first place, i hope this
did not mean to make a bad impression
Matt Mackall schrieb:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:45:04PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
Hi Linus,
hi LKML,
i would like to thank LKML and especially Eric (thanks for the pe
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:43:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > - something to do with aux vector headers
>
> the primary goal is to pass a random value to userspace at process
> start; this to save glibc from having to open /dev/urandom on ever
> program start (which it does now for all app
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:43:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 22:45 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:45:04PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> > > Hi Linus,
> > > hi LKML,
> > >
> > > i would like to thank LKML and especially Eric (thanks for the
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 22:45 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:45:04PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> > hi LKML,
> >
> > i would like to thank LKML and especially Eric (thanks for the per_cpu
> > macro tips and design guidelines!) and the other contributors to
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:45:04PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> hi LKML,
>
> i would like to thank LKML and especially Eric (thanks for the per_cpu
> macro tips and design guidelines!) and the other contributors to this idea.
>
> This time the patch is rather big because it also
Hi Linus,
hi LKML,
i would like to thank LKML and especially Eric (thanks for the per_cpu
macro tips and design guidelines!) and the other contributors to this idea.
This time the patch is rather big because it also removes
get_random_int() and introduces get_random_long() throughout the kern
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pappy/kernel/linux-2.6.21.5-get_urandom_long-AT_ENTROPY.patch
>
> this patch adds the function drivers/char/random.c:get_random_long()
> and adds an AT_ENTROPY field in the auxv without config optio
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:34:13 +0200
Alexander Gabert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Alexander
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pappy/kernel/linux-2.6.21.5-get_urandom_long-AT_ENTROPY.patch
>
> this patch adds the function drivers/char/random.c:get_random_long()
> and adds an AT_ENTROPY field
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Alexander Gabert wrote:
>
> this patch adds the function drivers/char/random.c:get_random_long()
It's totally whitespace-damaged, and I wonder why the "int" vs "long" is
so important. Also, what are the performance implications for execve?
Linus
-
To unsub
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 17:34 +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pappy/kernel/linux-2.6.21.5-get_urandom_long-AT_ENTROPY.patch
>
> this patch adds the function drivers/char/random.c:get_random_long()
> and adds an AT_ENTROPY field in the auxv without config option
> (th
Hi,
http://dev.gentoo.org/~pappy/kernel/linux-2.6.21.5-get_urandom_long-AT_ENTROPY.patch
this patch adds the function drivers/char/random.c:get_random_long()
and adds an AT_ENTROPY field in the auxv without config option
(the config option was removed as suggested by Arjan on LKML).
README: get
12 matches
Mail list logo
