On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:30:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Commit 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
> properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
> handler. In part this was done because the AST2500 datasheet says:
>
> I2CD10 Inter
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:11 PM Joel Stanley wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 13:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Commit 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
> > properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
> > handler. In part this was don
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 13:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Commit 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
> properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
> handler. In part this was done because the AST2500 datasheet says:
>
> I2CD10 Interrupt Statu
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:16:59AM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
> On 9/17/2018 9:34 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >>Looks good to me. Thanks! :)
> >>
> >>Acked-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
> >
> >Does that mean I need to revert "[PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle
> >master/slave combined irq events properl
On 9/17/2018 9:34 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Looks good to me. Thanks! :)
Acked-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
Does that mean I need to revert "[PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle
master/slave combined irq events properly" in i2c/for-next? And apply
this to i2c/for-current?
(and please quote only relev
> Looks good to me. Thanks! :)
>
> Acked-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
Does that mean I need to revert "[PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle
master/slave combined irq events properly" in i2c/for-next? And apply
this to i2c/for-current?
(and please quote only relevat parts of a message when replying)
On 9/13/2018 8:30 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Commit 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
handler. In part this was done because the AST2500 datasheet says:
I2CD10 Interrupt Status Register
bi
Commit 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
handler. In part this was done because the AST2500 datasheet says:
I2CD10 Interrupt Status Register
bit 2 Receive Done Interrupt status
S/W
8 matches
Mail list logo