On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:30:19PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/02, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> >
> > > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void syscall_rollback(struct task_struct
> > > *task,
> > >
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:25:54AM +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that
> `ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly.
>
> The bug is in mismatch between get/set errors:
>
> static inline long syscall_get_error(struct
On 03/02, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void syscall_rollback(struct task_struct
> > *task,
> > static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
> >
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 00:25:54 +
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that
> `ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly.
>
> The bug is in mismatch between get/set errors:
>
> static inline long syscall_get_error(struct
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 10:21:56 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Sergei!
>
> On 2/21/21 1:25 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that
> > `ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly.
> > (...)
>
> Do these two
Hi Sergei!
On 2/21/21 1:25 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that
> `ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly.
> (...)
Do these two patches unbreak gdb on ia64?
And have you, by any chance, managed to get the hpsa driver
In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that
`ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly.
The bug is in mismatch between get/set errors:
static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
7 matches
Mail list logo
