On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 06:25:03PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> On 07/09/18 18:13, Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> > This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I
> > acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it
> > didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 06:25:03PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> On 07/09/18 18:13, Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> > This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I
> > acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it
> > didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since
On 07/09/18 18:13, Doug Ledford wrote:
This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I
acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it
didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since only one patch out of some
large number touched rdma files). Now it is
On 07/09/18 18:13, Doug Ledford wrote:
This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I
acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it
didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since only one patch out of some
large number touched rdma files). Now it is
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 09:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> > Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
>
> This whole assert can be removed.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> > Acked-by: Doug Ledford
>
> Most probably
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 09:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> > Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
>
> This whole assert can be removed.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> > Acked-by: Doug Ledford
>
> Most probably
On 05/09/18 09:01, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
This whole assert can be removed.
ok
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
Acked-by: Doug Ledford
Most probably that I missed discussion, but
On 05/09/18 09:01, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
This whole assert can be removed.
ok
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
Acked-by: Doug Ledford
Most probably that I missed discussion, but
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
This whole assert can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> Acked-by: Doug Ledford
Most probably that I missed discussion, but anyway, does this
"Acked-by" come from internal or
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
This whole assert can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> Acked-by: Doug Ledford
Most probably that I missed discussion, but anyway, does this
"Acked-by" come from internal or
Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
Acked-by: Doug Ledford
Cc: Faisal Latif
Cc: Chien Tung
Cc: Roland Dreier
Cc: Faisal Latif
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes.h | 2 +-
Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
Acked-by: Doug Ledford
Cc: Faisal Latif
Cc: Chien Tung
Cc: Roland Dreier
Cc: Faisal Latif
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes.h | 2 +-
12 matches
Mail list logo