On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:07:50PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > __ipmi_bmc_register() jumps to the label 'out_free_my_dev_name' in an
> > > error path. So we can remove duplicate code in the if (rv).
> >
> > Looks correct, queued for next release.
>
> 1. Can an imperative wording be preferre
> > __ipmi_bmc_register() jumps to the label 'out_free_my_dev_name' in an
> > error path. So we can remove duplicate code in the if (rv).
>
> Looks correct, queued for next release.
1. Can an imperative wording be preferred for the change description?
2. Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for th
2 matches
Mail list logo
