Hello,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> On 21/Apr/2024 14:01, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> > I'm guessing what should be the Fixes line, may be?:
> >
> > Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")
>
> This seems like the right one.
>
> > because SCTP GSO was add
On 21/Apr/2024 14:01, Julian Anastasov wrote:
<...>
> Thanks for the fix, I'll accept this but skb_is_gso_sctp()
> has comment for pre-condition: skb_is_gso(skb). Can you send v2
> with it?
Thanks; sent!
> I'm guessing what should be the Fixes line, may be?:
>
> Fixes: 90017accff61 (
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
> the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
> disabling GSO.
>
> IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
>
It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
disabling GSO.
IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
Co-developed-by: Firo Yang
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno
Tested-by: An
4 matches
Mail list logo
