On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 3:26 PM Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
>
> Just tested this on the SiFive HiFive Unleashed. Seems to work OK;
> however I did not stress-test it.
>
> Tested-by: Paul Walmsley # HiFive Unleashed
>
>
> - Paul
>
>
> # !cat
> cat /proc/interrupts
>CPU0 CPU1 CP
Just tested this on the SiFive HiFive Unleashed. Seems to work OK;
however I did not stress-test it.
Tested-by: Paul Walmsley # HiFive Unleashed
- Paul
# !cat
cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
1: 0 0 0 0 Si
With the fixes it seems to still work fine on the Kendryte KD210.
Although currently only the serial interrupt is tested and this might
not be a very exhaustive test case..
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:33:23 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:04:56 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
> On 9/15/19 2:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
>> Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:41:07 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
On 9/16/19 4:51 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:04:56 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
On 9/15/19 2:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Hi Palmer,
On Sun, 15 Sep 201
On 9/16/19 4:51 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:04:56 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
>> On 9/15/19 2:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
>>> Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Palmer,
>>>
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:24:20 PDT (-0700), m...@kerne
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:04:56 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
> > On 9/15/19 2:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
> >> Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Palmer,
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 15 Sep 20
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:04:56 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
On 9/15/19 2:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Hi Palmer,
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:24:20 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:40:34 +0100,
Darius Rad wrote:
On 9/15/19 2:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
> Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> Hi Palmer,
>
>>
>> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:24:20 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:40:34 +0100,
>>> Darius Rad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Darius,
>>>
As per the
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:20:40 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Hi Palmer,
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:24:20 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:40:34 +0100,
> Darius Rad wrote:
>
> Hi Darius,
>
>>
>> As per the
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:31:33 +0100,
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Hi Palmer,
>
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:24:20 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:40:34 +0100,
> > Darius Rad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Darius,
> >
> >>
> >> As per the existing comment, irq_mask and irq_unmask do no
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:24:20 PDT (-0700), m...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:40:34 +0100,
Darius Rad wrote:
Hi Darius,
As per the existing comment, irq_mask and irq_unmask do not need
to do anything for the PLIC. However, the functions must exist
(the pointers cannot be NULL) as
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:40:34 +0100,
Darius Rad wrote:
Hi Darius,
>
> As per the existing comment, irq_mask and irq_unmask do not need
> to do anything for the PLIC. However, the functions must exist
> (the pointers cannot be NULL) as they are not optional, based on
> the documentation (Documen
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:42:32 PDT (-0700), charles.papon...@gmail.com wrote:
I had issues with that plic driver. The current implementation wasn't
usable with driver using level sensitive interrupt together with the
IRQF_ONESHOT flag.
Those null were producing crashes in the chained_irq_enter fun
I had issues with that plic driver. The current implementation wasn't
usable with driver using level sensitive interrupt together with the
IRQF_ONESHOT flag.
Those null were producing crashes in the chained_irq_enter function.
Filling them with dummy function fixed the issue.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:40:34 PDT (-0700), Darius Rad wrote:
As per the existing comment, irq_mask and irq_unmask do not need
to do anything for the PLIC. However, the functions must exist
(the pointers cannot be NULL) as they are not optional, based on
the documentation (Documentation/core-api/g
As per the existing comment, irq_mask and irq_unmask do not need
to do anything for the PLIC. However, the functions must exist
(the pointers cannot be NULL) as they are not optional, based on
the documentation (Documentation/core-api/genericirq.rst) as well
as existing usage (e.g., include/linux/
17 matches
Mail list logo
