* H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 01:57 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure this was intended instead ;) The patch doesn't seem to make
> > any difference in code generation with my gcc.
> >
>
> Which is odd, because doesn't unlikely() booleanize?
It's supposed to:
include/linu
On 10/11/2013 01:57 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I'm sure this was intended instead ;) The patch doesn't seem to make
> any difference in code generation with my gcc.
>
Which is odd, because doesn't unlikely() booleanize?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 22:50:50 +0200 (CEST) Roel Kluin
wrote:
> untested, but wasn't this intended instead?
> --
> if (unlikely(x) > 0) doesn't seem to help branch prediction
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> @@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ static
untested, but wasn't this intended instead?
--
if (unlikely(x) > 0) doesn't seem to help branch prediction
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
---
diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
index a507907..cf08540 100644
--- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
+++ b/include/li
4 matches
Mail list logo