On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:08:30 -0400
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:58:32 -0400, "Valdis Klētnieks" said:
> >
> > CC kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.o
> > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:41: warning: cannot understand function
> > prototype: 'struct trace_kprobe '
> >
> > The
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:14:52 -0700
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > NACK.
> >
> > This isn't a kernel doc comment, and I don't want to make it one when
> > it is not. Just ignore that warning.
> >
> > -- Steve
>
> Huh? The patch doesn't do that -- it does the opposite of that.
> I.e., begin a non-ke
On 3/12/19 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:58:32 -0400
> "Valdis Klētnieks" wrote:
>
>> CC kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.o
>> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:41: warning: cannot understand function
>> prototype: 'struct trace_kprobe '
>>
>> The real problem is that a comme
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:58:32 -0400
"Valdis Klētnieks" wrote:
> CC kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.o
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:41: warning: cannot understand function
> prototype: 'struct trace_kprobe '
>
> The real problem is that a comment looked like kerneldoc when it shouldn't
> be...
CC kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.o
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:41: warning: cannot understand function prototype:
'struct trace_kprobe '
The real problem is that a comment looked like kerneldoc when it shouldn't be...
Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.
5 matches
Mail list logo