On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:10:25 + (GMT)
Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I don't see anything in arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c depending on
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU (in 2.6.20-rc1), sorry.
>
> I run 2.6.19.1 and there both mc_cp
Hi Jean,
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Jean Delvare wrote:
I don't see anything in arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c depending on
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU (in 2.6.20-rc1), sorry.
I run 2.6.19.1 and there both mc_cpu_notifier (which your patch modified)
and mc_cpu_callback (which uses mc_cpu_notifier) are inside
Hi Tigran,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:04:39 + (GMT), Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Ok, your patch is correct, although I assume you realize that it does
> nothing --- both the function and the data it operates on are inside
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and checking include/linux/init.h I see that
> __cpuini
Hi Jean,
Ok, your patch is correct, although I assume you realize that it does
nothing --- both the function and the data it operates on are inside
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and checking include/linux/init.h I see that
__cpuinitdata is nothing in this case. E.g. msr_class_cpu_notifier in the
msr dri
Structure mc_cpu_notifier references a __cpuinit function, but
isn't declared __cpuinitdata itself:
WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/microcode.o - Section mismatch: reference
to .init.text: from .data after 'mc_cpu_notifier' (at offset 0x118)
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/i38
5 matches
Mail list logo