On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Andrey Ryabinin
wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 09:15 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>
But not quite acked by me. What happened to the vfree code that
causes vfree_deferred to be called in a preemptable context? That
sounds like a bug.
>>>
>>> Not sure
On 12/13/2016 09:15 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> But not quite acked by me. What happened to the vfree code that
>>> causes vfree_deferred to be called in a preemptable context? That
>>> sounds like a bug.
>>
>> Not sure I understand but the above stack points to a preemptible
>> context
On 12/13/2016 08:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 13-12-16 08:57:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> [CC Andy]
>>>
>>> I've noticed the same
>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209142820.ga4...@dhcp22.suse.cz
>>> and also concluded same as you
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 13-12-16 08:57:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > [CC Andy]
>> >
>> > I've noticed the same
>> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209142820.ga4...@dhcp22.suse.cz
>> > and also concluded
On Tue 13-12-16 08:57:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [CC Andy]
> >
> > I've noticed the same
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209142820.ga4...@dhcp22.suse.cz
> > and also concluded same as you
> >
> > On Mon 12-12-16 17:46:21, Andrey Ryabinin
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [CC Andy]
>
> I've noticed the same
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209142820.ga4...@dhcp22.suse.cz
> and also concluded same as you
>
> On Mon 12-12-16 17:46:21, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> DEBUG_PREEMPT complains about using this_cpu_ptr() in
[CC Andy]
I've noticed the same
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209142820.ga4...@dhcp22.suse.cz
and also concluded same as you
On Mon 12-12-16 17:46:21, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> DEBUG_PREEMPT complains about using this_cpu_ptr() in preemptible:
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [
DEBUG_PREEMPT complains about using this_cpu_ptr() in preemptible:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
iperf-300s-cs-l/277
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
CPU: 1 PID: 277 Comm: iperf-300s-cs-l Not tainted
4.9.0-rc8-00140-gcc639db #2
8 matches
Mail list logo