Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

Christoph Hellwig writes: > I tend to agree. Unfortunately powers higher than me like these > horrible notifier schemes. Then again at least the die path is not > performance critical unlike the page faul path where I still need a > comment for you on getting rid of the notifier. Sounds

Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

Christoph Hellwig writes: I tend to agree. Unfortunately powers higher than me like these horrible notifier schemes. Then again at least the die path is not performance critical unlike the page faul path where I still need a comment for you on getting rid of the notifier. Sounds

[PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code fix vmalloc_sync_all in nommu

Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- mm/nommu.c |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c index 2d0a82f..0016557 100644 --- a/mm/nommu.c +++ b/mm/nommu.c @@ -261,6 +261,14 @@ void vunmap(void *addr) } /* + * Implement a

[PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code fix vmalloc_sync_all in nommu

Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- mm/nommu.c |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c index 2d0a82f..0016557 100644 --- a/mm/nommu.c +++ b/mm/nommu.c @@ -261,6 +261,14 @@ void vunmap(void *addr) } /* + * Implement a

Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:32:09AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Seems OK, although I think kprobes should not be using notify_die. > The set of events that kprobes is interested in has no intersection at > all with the set that any other consumer of the notify_die events is > interested in, on

Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:32:09AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Seems OK, although I think kprobes should not be using notify_die. The set of events that kprobes is interested in has no intersection at all with the set that any other consumer of the notify_die events is interested in, on any

Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

Christoph Hellwig writes: > This patch moves the die notifier handling to common code. Previous > various architectures had exactly the same code for it. Note that > the new code is compiled unconditionally, this should be understood > as an appel to the other architecture maintainer to

Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

Christoph Hellwig writes: This patch moves the die notifier handling to common code. Previous various architectures had exactly the same code for it. Note that the new code is compiled unconditionally, this should be understood as an appel to the other architecture maintainer to implement

[PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

This patch moves the die notifier handling to common code. Previous various architectures had exactly the same code for it. Note that the new code is compiled unconditionally, this should be understood as an appel to the other architecture maintainer to implement support for it aswell (aka

[PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code

This patch moves the die notifier handling to common code. Previous various architectures had exactly the same code for it. Note that the new code is compiled unconditionally, this should be understood as an appel to the other architecture maintainer to implement support for it aswell (aka