Hi Brian,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Brian Norris
wrote:
> I'm curious: do your broken compilers also generate broken code/data?
> i.e., does gcc 4.4.7 give 2500 its proper ULL value still?
Yes it does (checked the assembler output).
>> > However, I could be convinced to apply thi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:51:51PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Brian Norris
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c:45: warning: integer constant is too large
> >> for ‘long’ type
Hi Brian,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Brian Norris
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c:45: warning: integer constant is too large
>> for ‘long’ type
>
> On what compiler / static analyzer?
Any 32-bit version of gcc
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c:45: warning: integer constant is too large
> for ‘long’ type
On what compiler / static analyzer?
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c | 2 +-
> 1 file ch
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c:45: warning: integer constant is too large for
‘long’ type
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_timings.c
5 matches
Mail list logo