From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:31:10 +0100
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:13:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:29:55AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> > While you are on it, please fix rtnl_lock_unregistering_all() too?
>>
>> Ah, that's hidden someplace els
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:16:57 +0100
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> [ 122.247299] [ cut here ]
>> [ 122.247328] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at kernel/sched/core.c:7312
>> __might_sleep+0x50/0x249()
>> [ 122.247334]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:13:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:29:55AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > While you are on it, please fix rtnl_lock_unregistering_all() too?
>
> Ah, that's hidden someplace else, sure I can do that. Thanks for
> pointing it out.
Here goes..
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:29:55AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> (Adding netdev@...)
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > Dave, this relies on bits currently in tip/sched/core, if you're ok I'll
> > merge it through that tree.
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: netdev: Fix sleepin
(Adding netdev@...)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Dave, this relies on bits currently in tip/sched/core, if you're ok I'll
> merge it through that tree.
>
> ---
> Subject: netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event
> From: Peter Zijlstra
> Date: Wed Oct 29 17:04:56 CET 2
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> [ 122.247299] [ cut here ]
> [ 122.247328] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at kernel/sched/core.c:7312
> __might_sleep+0x50/0x249()
> [ 122.247334] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at
> [] p
6 matches
Mail list logo
