On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
wrote:
> On 2/20/2014 10:23 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>
>> Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
>> driver on optimus laptops.
>>
>> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
>> has special
Thanks, Rafael.
Will cc ACPI maillist next time.
On 2014/2/21 4:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On 2/20/2014 10:23 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
>> driver on optimus laptops.
>>
>> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method
On 2/20/2014 10:23 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
driver on optimus laptops.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI
Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
driver on optimus laptops.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private
Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
driver on optimus laptops.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private
On 2/20/2014 10:23 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
driver on optimus laptops.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI
Thanks, Rafael.
Will cc ACPI maillist next time.
On 2014/2/21 4:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On 2/20/2014 10:23 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
driver on optimus laptops.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com wrote:
On 2/20/2014 10:23 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
Fix regression caused by commit b072e53, which breaks loading nouveau
driver on optimus laptops.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
On 2014/2/19 18:12, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
>> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
>> has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
>> from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private
op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
to check availability of _DSM functions instead of
Hi Maarten,
Forgot to refresh my working tree. Please help to
apply this patch on top of previous one to solve a compilation bug.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/no
index c6c7d0d..83face3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
+++
Hi Maarten,
Forgot to refresh my working tree. Please help to
apply this patch on top of previous one to solve a compilation bug.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/no
index c6c7d0d..83face3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
+++
op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
to check availability of _DSM functions instead of
On 2014/2/19 18:12, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
to
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common
acpi_check_dsm() interface.
On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common
acpi_check_dsm() interface.
16 matches
Mail list logo
