Re: [PATCH] omit POSIX timer stuff from task_struct when disabled

2017-01-20 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, John Stultz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre > wrote: > > Just tell me if you prefer that I respin the patch and I'll do it. > > Yea. I'm not so finicky but I'm sure I'll probably get yelled at if I > pass it on, so if you don't mind respinning it, I'

Re: [PATCH] omit POSIX timer stuff from task_struct when disabled

2017-01-20 Thread John Stultz
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, John Stultz wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre >> wrote: >> > When CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled, it is preferable to remove related >> > structures from struct task_struct and struct signal_st

Re: [PATCH] omit POSIX timer stuff from task_struct when disabled

2017-01-20 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, John Stultz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre > wrote: > > When CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled, it is preferable to remove related > > structures from struct task_struct and struct signal_struct as they > > won't contain anything useful and shouldn't b

Re: [PATCH] omit POSIX timer stuff from task_struct when disabled

2017-01-20 Thread John Stultz
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > When CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled, it is preferable to remove related > structures from struct task_struct and struct signal_struct as they > won't contain anything useful and shouldn't be relied upon by mistake. > Code still referencing t

[PATCH] omit POSIX timer stuff from task_struct when disabled

2017-01-09 Thread Nicolas Pitre
When CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled, it is preferable to remove related structures from struct task_struct and struct signal_struct as they won't contain anything useful and shouldn't be relied upon by mistake. Code still referencing those structures is also disabled here. Signed-off-by: Nicolas