On 8/13/2020 9:59 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 11-08-20, 14:09, Stephen Boyd wrote:
This is a goto maze! Any chance we can clean this up?
I have sent a short series in reply to this series, please have a
look. It should look better now.
Thanks, I was out a few days so could not get to the
On 11-08-20, 14:09, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is a goto maze! Any chance we can clean this up?
I have sent a short series in reply to this series, please have a
look. It should look better now.
--
viresh
On 8/11/2020 10:42 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:36:19PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can now be called with freq = 0 inorder
to either drop performance or bandwidth votes or to disable
regulators on platforms which support them.
In such cases,
Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2020-08-10 00:06:19)
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can now be called with freq = 0 inorder
> to either drop performance or bandwidth votes or to disable
> regulators on platforms which support them.
> In such cases, a subsequent call to dev_pm_opp_set_rate() with
> the same
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:36:19PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can now be called with freq = 0 inorder
> to either drop performance or bandwidth votes or to disable
> regulators on platforms which support them.
> In such cases, a subsequent call to dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
On 2020-08-10 12:36, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can now be called with freq = 0 inorder
to either drop performance or bandwidth votes or to disable
regulators on platforms which support them.
In such cases, a subsequent call to dev_pm_opp_set_rate() with
the same frequency ends
dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can now be called with freq = 0 inorder
to either drop performance or bandwidth votes or to disable
regulators on platforms which support them.
In such cases, a subsequent call to dev_pm_opp_set_rate() with
the same frequency ends up returning early because 'old_freq == freq'
7 matches
Mail list logo