On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:46:46AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:00:32PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:51:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > Michael
Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:00:32PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:51:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > Michael reported 'perf mem -t store record' being broken.
> > > The reason is latest rewo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:51:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Michael reported 'perf mem -t store record' being broken.
> > The reason is latest rework of this area:
> > commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored
Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Michael reported 'perf mem -t store record' being broken.
> The reason is latest rework of this area:
> commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored events array")
>
> We don't mark perf_mem_events store record when -t store
> op
Michael reported 'perf mem -t store record' being broken.
The reason is latest rework of this area:
commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored events array")
We don't mark perf_mem_events store record when -t store
option is specified.
Fixes: commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored
5 matches
Mail list logo