On 06/21/2013 05:30 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Friday 21 June 2013 13:06:47 Stephen Warren wrote:
...
>> IIRC the idea of the PULL_PIN_DEFAULT was to avoid having to specify
>> UP/DOWN for each pin/group, but could just say "default", which would
>> then reduce the number of
Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013, 14:24:12 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 22. Juni 2013, 01:30:18 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> >> [Stephen]
> >>
> >> > IIRC the idea of the PULL_PIN_DEFAULT was to avoid having to specify
> >> > UP/DOWN for ea
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Samstag, 22. Juni 2013, 01:30:18 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
>> [Stephen]
>> > IIRC the idea of the PULL_PIN_DEFAULT was to avoid having to specify
>> > UP/DOWN for each pin/group, but could just say "default", which would
>> > then reduce t
Am Samstag, 22. Juni 2013, 01:30:18 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Friday 21 June 2013 13:06:47 Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 06/20/2013 06:38 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > > On 19/06/13 23:03, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > >> On 06/16/2013 04:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > >>> From: Linu
Hi Stephen,
On Friday 21 June 2013 13:06:47 Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 06:38 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > On 19/06/13 23:03, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 06/16/2013 04:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> From: Linus Walleij
> >>>
> >>> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in
On 06/20/2013 06:38 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> On 19/06/13 23:03, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/16/2013 04:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> From: Linus Walleij
>>>
>>> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
>>> manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
>>> p
On 19/06/13 23:03, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/16/2013 04:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> From: Linus Walleij
>>
>> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
>> manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
>> pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-dow
On 06/16/2013 04:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij
>
> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
> manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
> pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
> of 0 to such a generic option mean
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Lothar Waßmann
wrote:
> Linus Walleij writes:
>> - * if it is 0, pull-up is disabled.
>> + * if it is 0, pull-up it total, i.e. the pin is connected to VDD.
> ^^
> 'is'?
Thanks for noticing, fixed this up when applying.
Yours,
Li
On 16/06/13 22:45, Linus Walleij wrote:
From: Linus Walleij
It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
of 0 to such a generic option means that the pin
Hi Linus,
On Sunday 16 June 2013 12:45:48 Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij
>
> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
> manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
> pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
> of 0 to such a
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:45:48 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> From: Linus Walleij
>
> It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
> manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
> pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
> of 0 to such a gener
From: Linus Walleij
It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
of 0 to such a generic option means that the pin is
short-circuited to VDD or GROUND. Pull
13 matches
Mail list logo
