On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:11 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 03 of February 2005 07:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > > Are you seriously proposing this for 2.6.11??
> >
> > Well... There should be no problem with
> > add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch and
> >
On Thursday 03 of February 2005 07:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Are you seriously proposing this for 2.6.11??
>
> Well... There should be no problem with
> add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch and
> update-aty128fb-sleep-wakeup-code-for-new-powermac-changes.patch.
>
> radeonfb is another
On Thursday 03 of February 2005 07:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Are you seriously proposing this for 2.6.11??
Well... There should be no problem with
add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch and
update-aty128fb-sleep-wakeup-code-for-new-powermac-changes.patch.
radeonfb is another story, but
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:11 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 03 of February 2005 07:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Are you seriously proposing this for 2.6.11??
Well... There should be no problem with
add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch and
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:27 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I don't think Linus _can_ apply it - he doesn't have
> try_acquire_console_sem() for a start.
Right, that's a pre-req.
> I currently have:
>
> add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch
>
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:27 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
I don't think Linus _can_ apply it - he doesn't have
try_acquire_console_sem() for a start.
Right, that's a pre-req.
I currently have:
add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch
6 matches
Mail list logo
