On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 03:03:00PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> > What is going on about that patch?
>
> Mark fixed the problem with the following commits:
Thanks for the info, Fabio.
Shawn
>
> commit 75bc9641cadd2a3f91f9c2e7f2fdfdeb8bd
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> What is going on about that patch?
Mark fixed the problem with the following commits:
commit 75bc9641cadd2a3f91f9c2e7f2fdfdeb8bd4b1d6
Author: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Nov 27 16:22:53 2013 +
regulator: core: Check for DT every time we
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:55:20AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:46:03AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > lot changing the callers is probably the cleanest. I'll probably do
> > that tomorrow if a patch doesn't turn up before then.
>
> Sorry, that'll now be Wednesday - an u
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:46:03AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> lot changing the callers is probably the cleanest. I'll probably do
> that tomorrow if a patch doesn't turn up before then.
Sorry, that'll now be Wednesday - an unusually busy day started by
someone deciding to fell trees outside my w
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:57:35PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Calling regulator_init_complete via late_initcall can be too 'late' for the
> regulator to be available for the pwm backlight driver.
> Call regulator_init_complete with postcore_initcall level instead.
That's too early for some o
From: Fabio Estevam
Commit 22c1 (pwm-backlight: Add power supply support) introduced the usage
of regulator API into the pwm backlight driver and caused a regression on some
boards like mx28evk and mx6qsabresd, resulting in blank display output:
pwm-backlight backlight.18: dummy supplies no
6 matches
Mail list logo
