On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:29:45AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> Hi Tycho,
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:36 PM Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Guo Ren
> > >
> > > Obviously, there is no need to recover a0-a7 in reject path.
Hi Tycho,
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:36 PM Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren
> >
> > Obviously, there is no need to recover a0-a7 in reject path.
> >
> > Previous modification is from commit af33d243 by Tycho, to
> > fi
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren
>
> Obviously, there is no need to recover a0-a7 in reject path.
>
> Previous modification is from commit af33d243 by Tycho, to
> fixup seccomp reject syscall code path.
Doesn't this suffer from the same problem,
From: Guo Ren
Obviously, there is no need to recover a0-a7 in reject path.
Previous modification is from commit af33d243 by Tycho, to
fixup seccomp reject syscall code path.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren
Cc: Tycho Andersen
Cc: Kees Cook
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
---
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 3 +--
1
4 matches
Mail list logo