Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-02-02 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: Adrian Bunk > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:36:20 +0100 [] > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:49:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 >> Sam

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-02-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:49:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 > Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:24:17PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-02-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:49:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:24:17PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Signed-off-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-02-02 Thread Oleg Verych
From: Adrian Bunk Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:36:20 +0100 [] On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:49:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

2007-01-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 4:03 pm, Oleg Verych wrote: > Let me propose you to test this as solution, that need no awk, only shell: Actually awk is one of the standard Single Unix Specification (version 3) utilities and the kernel build uses it in a number of places, such as

[rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

2007-01-24 Thread Oleg Verych
> On Tuesday 23 January 2007 7:49 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: >> If the kernel is being compiled on a non-Linux system (eg: legacy Unix) >> then it is, I guess, possible for `awk' and `gawk' to offer different >> features. If the kernel's use of gawk uses GNU extensions then this patch >> might

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 7:49 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > If the kernel is being compiled on a non-Linux system (eg: legacy Unix) > then it is, I guess, possible for `awk' and `gawk' to offer different > features. If the kernel's use of gawk uses GNU extensions then this patch > might break

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 7:49 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: If the kernel is being compiled on a non-Linux system (eg: legacy Unix) then it is, I guess, possible for `awk' and `gawk' to offer different features. If the kernel's use of gawk uses GNU extensions then this patch might break things

[rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

2007-01-24 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 7:49 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: If the kernel is being compiled on a non-Linux system (eg: legacy Unix) then it is, I guess, possible for `awk' and `gawk' to offer different features. If the kernel's use of gawk uses GNU extensions then this patch might break things

Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

2007-01-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 4:03 pm, Oleg Verych wrote: Let me propose you to test this as solution, that need no awk, only shell: Actually awk is one of the standard Single Unix Specification (version 3) utilities and the kernel build uses it in a number of places, such as

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:24:17PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Use "awk" instead of "gawk". > > > > -- > > > >

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:46 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:24:17PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Signed-off-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use awk instead of gawk. -- There's a symlink from awk to

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-15 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:24:17PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PS My dev machine is broke and need a new one before kbuild.git will be alive again. Considering an AMD Athlon 64 X2 based one with Nvidia

[PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-15 Thread Rob Landley
Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Use "awk" instead of "gawk". -- There's a symlink from awk to gawk if you're using the gnu tools, but no symlink from gawk to awk if you're using BusyBox or some such. (There's a reason for the existence of standard names. Can we use them

[PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-15 Thread Rob Landley
Signed-off-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use awk instead of gawk. -- There's a symlink from awk to gawk if you're using the gnu tools, but no symlink from gawk to awk if you're using BusyBox or some such. (There's a reason for the existence of standard names. Can we use them please?)

Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/ scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh

2007-01-15 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:24:17PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Signed-off-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS My dev machine is broke and need a new one before kbuild.git will be alive again. Considering an AMD Athlon 64 X2 based one with Nvidia GeForce™