Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-07 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Tue, 5 May 2020 18:14:45 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote: > The UNRESOLVED state is much more apporiate than the UNSUPPORTED state > for the absence of the test module, as it matches "test was set up > incorrectly" situation in the README file. > > A possible scenario is that the function was

Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-06 Thread Shuah Khan
On 5/6/20 9:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 6 May 2020 09:46:21 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: You keep forgetting to Cc Shuah's other email. Thanks! I got the recipients list from the get_mainter.pl. Hmm. Seems like that is what

Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-06 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 6 May 2020 09:46:21 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > You keep forgetting to Cc Shuah's other email. > Thanks! > I got the recipients list from the get_mainter.pl. Hmm. Seems like that is what get_maintainer.pl does: Steven

Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-05 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > You keep forgetting to Cc Shuah's other email. Thanks! I got the recipients list from the get_mainter.pl. > > On Tue, 5 May 2020 18:14:45 +0800 > Po-Hsu Lin wrote: > > > The UNRESOLVED state is much more apporiate than the UNSUPPORTED

Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-05 Thread shuah
On 5/5/20 7:09 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: You keep forgetting to Cc Shuah's other email. On Tue, 5 May 2020 18:14:45 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote: The UNRESOLVED state is much more apporiate than the UNSUPPORTED state for the absence of the test module, as it matches "test was set up incorrectly"

Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
You keep forgetting to Cc Shuah's other email. On Tue, 5 May 2020 18:14:45 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote: > The UNRESOLVED state is much more apporiate than the UNSUPPORTED state > for the absence of the test module, as it matches "test was set up > incorrectly" situation in the README file. > > A

[PATCH] selftests/ftrace: mark irqsoff_tracer.tc test as unresolved if the test module does not exist

2020-05-05 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
The UNRESOLVED state is much more apporiate than the UNSUPPORTED state for the absence of the test module, as it matches "test was set up incorrectly" situation in the README file. A possible scenario is that the function was enabled (supported by the kernel) but the module was not installed