Re: [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,

2007-06-05 Thread David Miller
From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:08:51 -0700 (PDT) > they should merged into one > > Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch applied. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,

2007-06-02 Thread rae l
On 6/2/07, Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: they should merged into one this patch I have checked, it's not corrupted, I wonder someone can give some comment on this? Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/core/dst.c | 17 - 1 files changed, 4 insertio

[PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,

2007-06-01 Thread Denis Cheng
they should merged into one Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/core/dst.c | 17 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c index 764bccb..c6a0587 100644 --- a/net/core/dst.c +++ b/net/core/dst.c @@ -111,1

Re: [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one

2007-05-31 Thread rae l
On 5/31/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Your email client has changed all of the tab characters into spaces, corrupting the patch. Please configure your email client to not perform any text formatting. Please test this, by emailing the patch to yourself and trying to apply it, befo

Re: [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one

2007-05-31 Thread David Miller
From: Rankle_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:26:54 +0800 > From 30d6996860f7e5589d1bce10404bbcfd6592c9de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:58 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] since the definiti

[git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one

2007-05-31 Thread Rankle_
From 30d6996860f7e5589d1bce10404bbcfd6592c9de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same, they should merged into one Signed-off-by: Denis