On 15.07.20 21:06, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:11 PM Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:19:52PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
I would have expected that there is some kind of existing userspace API to
load an overlay manually, but it seems like there isn't!?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:11 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:19:52PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> > I would have expected that there is some kind of existing userspace API to
> > load an overlay manually, but it seems like there isn't!?
>
> > So what's the reasoning behind th
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:48:37PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 15.07.20 15:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm not sure platforms like this are a great fit for DT TBH - the
> > trouble with DT is that it turns things into ABIs regardless of if it's
> > really a finished thing, platform data base
On 15.07.20 15:10, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:45:51PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
On 15.07.20 13:36, Mark Brown wrote:
Hey, I proposed other solutions you didn't want to implement!
Right, but you have to admit that the other solutions turned out to be
rather out of sco
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:45:51PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 15.07.20 13:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hey, I proposed other solutions you didn't want to implement!
> Right, but you have to admit that the other solutions turned out to be
> rather out of scope for someone like me who merely
On 15.07.20 13:36, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
On 14.07.20 21:29, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
patch in our own tree, or if a node with a custom compatible string like for
example "
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 14.07.20 21:29, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> > > patch in our own tree, or if a node with a custom compatible string like
> > > for
> > > example "kontron,user-spi"
On 14.07.20 21:29, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
It would still be quite nice to benefit from the flexibility of DT overlays
not only for the SPI use case. But before I come up with any custom
solution, for now I will rather have the device
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> It would still be quite nice to benefit from the flexibility of DT overlays
> not only for the SPI use case. But before I come up with any custom
> solution, for now I will rather have the device in the DT statically.
> I just wo
On 13.07.20 17:11, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:19:52PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
I would have expected that there is some kind of existing userspace API to
load an overlay manually, but it seems like there isn't!?
So what's the reasoning behind this? How can I solve thi
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:19:52PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> I would have expected that there is some kind of existing userspace API to
> load an overlay manually, but it seems like there isn't!?
> So what's the reasoning behind this? How can I solve this in a
> mainline-compliant way, mea
On 02.07.20 18:24, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
On 02.07.20 17:07, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
My intention is to use the spidev driver in the default board DT for an
interface that is routed to an extension connector and has no dedicated
slav
On 02.07.20 17:07, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
My intention is to use the spidev driver in the default board DT for an
interface that is routed to an extension connector and has no dedicated
slave device attached onboard. So users can atta
Hi Geert,
On 02.07.20 16:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Frieder,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 4:46 PM Frieder Schrempf
wrote:
On 02.07.20 16:25, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
From: Frieder Schrempf
Allow external SPI ports on Kontron board
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> My intention is to use the spidev driver in the default board DT for an
> interface that is routed to an extension connector and has no dedicated
> slave device attached onboard. So users can attach sensors, etc. with
> userspace
Hi Frieder,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 4:46 PM Frieder Schrempf
wrote:
> On 02.07.20 16:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> >> From: Frieder Schrempf
> >>
> >> Allow external SPI ports on Kontron boards to use the spidev driver.
> >
> > I'd h
On 02.07.20 16:25, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
From: Frieder Schrempf
Allow external SPI ports on Kontron boards to use the spidev driver.
I'd have expected this to require loading a DT overlay for whatever's
attached?
My intention is
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> Allow external SPI ports on Kontron boards to use the spidev driver.
I'd have expected this to require loading a DT overlay for whatever's
attached?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
From: Frieder Schrempf
Allow external SPI ports on Kontron boards to use the spidev driver.
Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf
---
drivers/spi/spidev.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spidev.c b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
index 59e07675ef86..058b08a3767d 100644
--- a/dri
19 matches
Mail list logo
