On 05/12/2017 02:52, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Catching up on old patches.
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:03:52PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the authorized
>> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is
On 05/12/2017 02:52, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Catching up on old patches.
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:03:52PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the authorized
>> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is
Hello,
Catching up on old patches.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:03:52PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the authorized
> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
> thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need to
Hello,
Catching up on old patches.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:03:52PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the authorized
> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
> thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need to
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:25:07AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 22/08/2017 10:04, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Hi Leo,
> >>
> >> a cleanest solution would be either:
> >>
> >> - add the 3
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:25:07AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 22/08/2017 10:04, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Hi Leo,
> >>
> >> a cleanest solution would be either:
> >>
> >> - add the 3
On 22/08/2017 10:04, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> a cleanest solution would be either:
>>
>> - add the 3 missing thermal sensors in the DT and default to the id 2
>
> Yeah, so do you think below
On 22/08/2017 10:04, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> a cleanest solution would be either:
>>
>> - add the 3 missing thermal sensors in the DT and default to the id 2
>
> Yeah, so do you think below
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
> Hi Leo,
>
> a cleanest solution would be either:
>
> - add the 3 missing thermal sensors in the DT and default to the id 2
Yeah, so do you think below change works for you?
---8<---
ARM64: dts:
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
> Hi Leo,
>
> a cleanest solution would be either:
>
> - add the 3 missing thermal sensors in the DT and default to the id 2
Yeah, so do you think below change works for you?
---8<---
ARM64: dts:
On 08/08/2017 15:29, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:48:51PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> @@ -352,10 +353,9 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> ret = hisi_thermal_register_sensor(pdev, data,
>
On 08/08/2017 15:29, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:48:51PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> @@ -352,10 +353,9 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> ret = hisi_thermal_register_sensor(pdev, data,
>
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 21:29 +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:48:51PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -352,10 +353,9 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct
> > > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > ret =
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 21:29 +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:48:51PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -352,10 +353,9 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct
> > > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > ret =
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:48:51PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
[...]
> > > > @@ -352,10 +353,9 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > ret = hisi_thermal_register_sensor(pdev, data,
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:48:51PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
[...]
> > > > @@ -352,10 +353,9 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > ret = hisi_thermal_register_sensor(pdev, data,
> > > >
> >
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 12:15 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/08/2017 09:55, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 17:03 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >
> > > The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the
> > > authorized
> > > MAX_SENSORS interval to register the
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 12:15 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/08/2017 09:55, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 17:03 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >
> > > The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the
> > > authorized
> > > MAX_SENSORS interval to register the
On 08/08/2017 09:55, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 17:03 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the
>> authorized
>> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
>> thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need
On 08/08/2017 09:55, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 17:03 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the
>> authorized
>> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
>> thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 17:03 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the
> authorized
> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
> thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need to spit on the console
> everytime we
>
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 17:03 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the
> authorized
> MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
> thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need to spit on the console
> everytime we
>
The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the authorized
MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need to spit on the console everytime we
failed to register thermal sensors, information which is deliberaly known
The sensor id is unknown at init time and we use all id in the authorized
MAX_SENSORS interval to register the sensor. On this SoC there is one
thermal-zone with one sensor on it. No need to spit on the console everytime we
failed to register thermal sensors, information which is deliberaly known
24 matches
Mail list logo
