On 22/08/2015 00:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE is important in order to achieve good performance
> (up to 2x, though more realistically +30-40%) in latency-bound workloads.
> However, it was removed by mistake together with VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH.
>
> It will be restored in the
On 22/08/2015 00:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE is important in order to achieve good performance
> (up to 2x, though more realistically +30-40%) in latency-bound workloads.
> However, it was removed by mistake together with VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH.
>
> It will be restored in the
VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE is important in order to achieve good performance
(up to 2x, though more realistically +30-40%) in latency-bound workloads.
However, it was removed by mistake together with VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH.
It will be restored in the next revision of the virtio 1.0 standard, so
do the
VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE is important in order to achieve good performance
(up to 2x, though more realistically +30-40%) in latency-bound workloads.
However, it was removed by mistake together with VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH.
It will be restored in the next revision of the virtio 1.0 standard, so
do the
4 matches
Mail list logo