Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO

2016-01-22 Thread Shuah Khan
On 01/22/2016 12:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote: >>> David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the >>> changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET >>> when used with ADJ_NANO. >>> >>> I've im

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO

2016-01-21 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote: > > David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the > > changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET > > when used with ADJ_NANO. > > > > I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO

2016-01-21 Thread Shuah Khan
On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote: > David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the > changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET > when used with ADJ_NANO. > > I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced > more unit tests to validate these going forward.

[PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO

2016-01-21 Thread John Stultz
David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET when used with ADJ_NANO. I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced more unit tests to validate these going forward. Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/