On 01/10/14 09:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 01/10/14 01:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On the substance.
I'm certainly not trying to antagonise you here - I assumed you were
*suggesting* to apply those comments directly ?
Which is why I updated the sent p
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 01/10/14 01:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On the substance.
> I'm certainly not trying to antagonise you here - I assumed you were
> *suggesting* to apply those comments directly ?
> Which is why I updated the sent patches with your comments - since t
On 01/10/14 01:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Bryan,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
what are you trying to achieve by sending out patches faster than
anyone can review?
Thomas.
That's not the intention at all.
Doing this has an obvious outcome:
1) The patches you whip up 10 se
Bryan,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
what are you trying to achieve by sending out patches faster than
anyone can review?
Doing this has an obvious outcome:
1) The patches you whip up 10 seconds after the review hits your
inbox are likely not to be well thought out. Neither
First patch:
Quark X1000 contains a 16k 4-way set associative unified L1 cache
with 256 sets. The second patch gets Quark X1000 reporting 16k of
cache in-line with other legacy reporting processors like PIII Tualatin
Second patch:
Adds a comment to arch/x86/kernel/setup.c. Quark SoC X1000
advertis
5 matches
Mail list logo
