Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-26 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Yes. Ingo Molnar wrote: > >* H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> >> >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 >either >> >> in my inbox nor on LKML... >> > >> > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even >>

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-26 Thread Ingo Molnar
* H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either > >> in my inbox nor on LKML... > > > > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even > > got a delivery confirmation from

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-26 Thread Ingo Molnar
* H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote: On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either in my inbox nor on LKML... I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even got a delivery confirmation from

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-26 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Yes. Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote: On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either in my inbox nor on LKML... I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either >> in my inbox nor on LKML... > > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even > got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than > e.g. from

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-25 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 24.01.13 at 18:32, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >> * Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > >>> v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between > >>> 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-25 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.01.13 at 18:32, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between >>> 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was >>> the second patch in a

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-25 Thread Jan Beulich
On 24.01.13 at 18:32, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote: On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote: v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was the second

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-25 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote: On 24.01.13 at 18:32, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote: On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote: v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either in my inbox nor on LKML... I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than e.g. from Ingo's, and

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-24 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jan Beulich wrote: > >> v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between >> 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was >> the second patch in a four patch series). >> >> 1: unify SSE-base xor-block

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between > 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was > the second patch in a four patch series). > > 1: unify SSE-base xor-block routines > 2: add alternative SSE implementation only

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote: v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was the second patch in a four patch series). 1: unify SSE-base xor-block routines 2: add alternative SSE implementation

Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2013-01-24 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote: v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was the second patch in a four patch series). 1: unify SSE-base xor-block

[PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2012-11-02 Thread Jan Beulich
v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was the second patch in a four patch series). 1: unify SSE-base xor-block routines 2: add alternative SSE implementation only prefetching once per 64-byte line 3: make

[PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

2012-11-02 Thread Jan Beulich
v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was the second patch in a four patch series). 1: unify SSE-base xor-block routines 2: add alternative SSE implementation only prefetching once per 64-byte line 3: make