Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] regmap: add force write option

2015-07-07 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Mark > > Can I have some feedback about these patches ? > > Please do allow some time for review, especially during the merge > window. Thank you for your feedback, and sorry for my reminder. I will re-send these to ML after -rc1 or -rc2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub

Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] regmap: add force write option

2015-07-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:07:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Can I have some feedback about these patches ? Please do allow some time for review, especially during the merge window. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] regmap: add force write option

2015-07-02 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Lars > > Current _regmap_update_bits() writes data to register if current value and > > write value was different. This means it doesn't write data if the value was > > same as current value. > > But, some device needs to write data even though it was same value. > > Can you go into more deta

Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] regmap: add force write option

2015-07-02 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 06/16/2015 10:51 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: Hi Mark Current _regmap_update_bits() writes data to register if current value and write value was different. This means it doesn't write data if the value was same as current value. But, some device needs to write data even though it was same va

Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] regmap: add force write option

2015-07-02 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Mark Can I have some feedback about these patches ? > Current _regmap_update_bits() writes data to register if current value and > write value was different. This means it doesn't write data if the value was > same as current value. > But, some device needs to write data even though it was sa

[PATCH 0/4][RFC] regmap: add force write option

2015-06-16 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Mark Current _regmap_update_bits() writes data to register if current value and write value was different. This means it doesn't write data if the value was same as current value. But, some device needs to write data even though it was same value. This RFC patch-set adds new "force_write" opt