Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:51:31AM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu: > My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was > not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc. > Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new > changes

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:51:31AM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu: > My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was > not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc. > Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new > changes

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc. Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new changes made. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc. Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new changes made. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri,

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote: > > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample > > entries. > > hi, > was there any change to the rfc post? I was wondering that, please

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote: > > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample > > entries. > > hi, > was there any change to the rfc post? I was wondering that, please

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote: > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample > entries. hi, was there any change to the rfc post? thanks, jirka > > Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate > the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote: > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample > entries. hi, was there any change to the rfc post? thanks, jirka > > Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate > the

[PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample entries. Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate the introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series adds the dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to

[PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample entries. Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate the introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series adds the dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to