Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:51:31AM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu:
> My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was
> not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc.
> Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new
> changes mad
My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was
not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc.
Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new
changes made.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Fri, J
Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
> > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample
> > entries.
>
> hi,
> was there any change to the rfc post?
I was wondering that, please s
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
> The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample
> entries.
hi,
was there any change to the rfc post?
thanks,
jirka
>
> Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate
> the intro
The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample
entries.
Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate
the introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series
adds the dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to
them
5 matches
Mail list logo