On Wed 03-01-18 16:05:23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:32:07 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > I've posted this as an RFC [1] and both Mike and Naoya seem to be OK
> > both with patches and the approach. I have rebased this on top of [2]
> > because there is a small conflict in mm/
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:32:07 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote:
> I've posted this as an RFC [1] and both Mike and Naoya seem to be OK
> both with patches and the approach. I have rebased this on top of [2]
> because there is a small conflict in mm/mempolicy.c. I know it is late
> in the release cycle but
Hi,
I've posted this as an RFC [1] and both Mike and Naoya seem to be OK
both with patches and the approach. I have rebased this on top of [2]
because there is a small conflict in mm/mempolicy.c. I know it is late
in the release cycle but similarly to [2] I would really like to see
this in linux-ne
3 matches
Mail list logo