Re: [PATCH 00/31] CPUFreq: Implement light weight ->target(): for 3.13

2013-08-12 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 13 August 2013 04:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, August 12, 2013 11:18:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Currently prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: >> >> int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, >> unsigned int relation); >> >> And most of

Re: [PATCH 00/31] CPUFreq: Implement light weight ->target(): for 3.13

2013-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, August 12, 2013 11:18:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Currently prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: > > int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, > unsigned int relation); > > And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get

[PATCH 00/31] CPUFreq: Implement light weight ->target(): for 3.13

2013-08-12 Thread Viresh Kumar
Currently prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target