Re: [PATCH 016/141] nfsd: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2021-04-20 Thread Chuck Lever III
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 4:28 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Friendly ping: who can take this, please? Hum. I thought this was going through another tree. I can take it for the second v5.13 NFSD PR. > Thanks > -- > Gustavo > > On 11/23/20 16:46, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

Re: [PATCH 016/141] nfsd: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2021-04-20 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/23/20 16:46, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:27:51PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 20, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva >>> wrote: >>> >>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fal

Re: [PATCH 016/141] nfsd: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-23 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:27:51PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > On Nov 20, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva > > wrote: > > > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple > > warnings by explicitly adding a couple of break statements instead of > > just le

[PATCH 016/141] nfsd: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-20 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding a couple of break statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- fs/nfsd/nfs4sta

Re: [PATCH 016/141] nfsd: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-20 Thread Chuck Lever
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva > wrote: > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple > warnings by explicitly adding a couple of break statements instead of > just letting the code fall through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/