On 24/02/2021 20:27, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:05:03AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Hi Jacopo,
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:01:26PM +, K
Hi Jacopo,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:05:03AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:01:26PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > > On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jaco
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:05:03AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:01:26PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > During the camera module initialization the image sensor PID
Hi Jacopo,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:01:26PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > During the camera module initialization the image sensor PID is read to
> > verify it can correctly be identified. The current implementation is
Hi Jacopo,
On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> During the camera module initialization the image sensor PID is read to
> verify it can correctly be identified. The current implementation is
> rather confused and uses a loop implemented with a label and a goto.
>
> Replace it with a more co
During the camera module initialization the image sensor PID is read to
verify it can correctly be identified. The current implementation is
rather confused and uses a loop implemented with a label and a goto.
Replace it with a more compact for() loop.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-
6 matches
Mail list logo