On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Olliver Schinagl
wrote:
> Hey Thierry,
>
> but why have the bit macro at all then :)
For my opinion, it's good to use in new code, or when you have this
change as a continuation of bigger series.
Though, others might have a different one :-)
>
> But that choice I
Hey Thierry,
but why have the bit macro at all then :)
But that choice I guess I leave to you, as it's your section, I know
some submaintainers prefer it and want it to be used, so I guess it's
something in general kernel wide that should be desided on, BIT() macro
preferred or not.
Olliver
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:35PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> From: Olliver Schinagl
>
> The pwm header defines bits manually while there is a nice bitops.h with
> a BIT() macro. Use the BIT() macro to set bits in pwm.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl
> ---
> include/linux/pwm.h | 7
From: Olliver Schinagl
The pwm header defines bits manually while there is a nice bitops.h with
a BIT() macro. Use the BIT() macro to set bits in pwm.h
Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl
---
include/linux/pwm.h | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/lin
4 matches
Mail list logo