On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:25:32 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Well I do think a significant amount of change is needed, in particular
> some more use of the /* operator.
Ack.
> Can you set up a new tree for that and for linux-next and leave the
> existing one in place?
Will do. May take a few d
On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:51:09 -0400 J__rn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:48:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:43:07 -0400 Joern Engel wrote:
> >
> > > Very few machines ever ran with 1.0 format and by now I doubt whether a
> > > single one still does. No need to c
On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:48:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:43:07 -0400 Joern Engel wrote:
>
> > Very few machines ever ran with 1.0 format and by now I doubt whether a
> > single one still does. No need to carry that code along.
>
> aw geeze. Can we please clean up the p
On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:43:07 -0400 Joern Engel wrote:
> Very few machines ever ran with 1.0 format and by now I doubt whether a
> single one still does. No need to carry that code along.
aw geeze. Can we please clean up the patch series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
Very few machines ever ran with 1.0 format and by now I doubt whether a
single one still does. No need to carry that code along.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel
---
drivers/block/blockconsole.c | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/b
5 matches
Mail list logo
