On 13/01/19 7:35 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/12/19 6:29 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: John Hubbard
>>
>> Commit 49e54187ae0b ("ata: libahci_platform: comply to PHY framework") uses
>> the PHY_MODE_SATA, but that enum had not yet been added. This caused a
>> build failure for me, w
On 14/01/19 2:27 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
> Olof Johansson wrote on Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:57:12
> -0800:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 6:05 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/12/19 6:29 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Hubbard
Commit 49e54187ae0b ("ata:
Hi Olof,
Olof Johansson wrote on Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:57:12
-0800:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 6:05 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > On 1/12/19 6:29 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: John Hubbard
> > >
> > > Commit 49e54187ae0b ("ata: libahci_platform: comply to PHY framework")
> > > u
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 6:05 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 1/12/19 6:29 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: John Hubbard
> >
> > Commit 49e54187ae0b ("ata: libahci_platform: comply to PHY framework") uses
> > the PHY_MODE_SATA, but that enum had not yet been added. This caused a
> > build f
On 1/12/19 6:29 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: John Hubbard
>
> Commit 49e54187ae0b ("ata: libahci_platform: comply to PHY framework") uses
> the PHY_MODE_SATA, but that enum had not yet been added. This caused a
> build failure for me, with today's linux.git.
>
> Also, there is a pot
From: John Hubbard
Commit 49e54187ae0b ("ata: libahci_platform: comply to PHY framework") uses
the PHY_MODE_SATA, but that enum had not yet been added. This caused a
build failure for me, with today's linux.git.
Also, there is a potentially conflicting (mis-named) PHY_MODE_SATA, hiding
in the Ma
6 matches
Mail list logo