Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:27:06AM +, Lee Jones wrote: > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the > puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call > back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't > required by a platform dat

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 12/03/2013 01:15 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > On 12/03/2013 01:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> > >>> On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA t

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 12/03/2013 01:15 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 12/03/2013 01:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> >>> On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the puzzle), then we don't need t

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 12/03/2013 01:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the >>> puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call >>> back or re

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the > > puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call > > back or require some of the historical bumph which proba

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the > puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call > back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't > required by a platform data start-up now eit

[PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

2013-12-03 Thread Lee Jones
If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be ripped out in upcoming com