Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
> multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
> case and each thermal zone has its own governor instance acting
> individually without
Gentle ping ...
On 04/06/2019 18:57, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
> multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
> case and each thermal zone has its own governor instance acting
> individually without
On 16/06/2019 11:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:30:13PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 14/06/2019 16:02, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 14/06/2019 14:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 14/06/2019 11:35, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Dienstag, 4.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:30:13PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 14/06/2019 16:02, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 14/06/2019 14:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 14/06/2019 11:35, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>
On 14/06/2019 16:02, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 14/06/2019 14:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 14/06/2019 11:35, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
On 14/06/2019 14:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 14/06/2019 11:35, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This
On 14/06/2019 11:35, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
>> multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
>> case and each thermal
On 14/06/2019 10:35, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
case and each thermal zone has its
Hi Daniel,
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
> multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
> case and each thermal zone has its own governor instance acting
>
Hi all,
is there any comment on these two patches?
On 04/06/2019 18:57, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
> multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
> case and each thermal zone has its own governor
Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
case and each thermal zone has its own governor instance acting
individually without collaboration with other governors.
As the cooling device for the CPU
11 matches
Mail list logo