On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll take your patch-series rather than the recent pull from Andy,
> and pick up #2 that way too.
Hmm. In fact, #2 doesn't apply cleanly. It's trivial to fix up, but
rather than do that, the reject made me go "I'll just forward this t
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> No, it's good to blame me. I was trying to deal with it as fast as I
> could since I was already trying to ignore my computer before I got
> married last weekend and took the last week off. I realized when I got
> back yesterday you hadn't p
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:36 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> > In this particular case, it's my patch, and I've never sent you a pull
> > request. I sort of assumed that secur...@kernel.org magically caused
> > acknowledged fixes to end u
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:04:16PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:51:37PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> [cc list trimmed, security@ added]
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Ju
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:51:37PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> [cc list trimmed, security@ added]
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 a
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:51:37PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> [cc list trimmed, security@ added]
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> >
> >> > But yes, havi
[cc list trimmed, security@ added]
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> >
>> > But yes, having something "real" might be good if the load gets higher,
>> > right now it's
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:30:19PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirs
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH
>> >> wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wr
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> In this particular case, it's my patch, and I've never sent you a pull
> request. I sort of assumed that secur...@kernel.org magically caused
> acknowledged fixes to end up in your tree. I'm not sure what I'm
> supposed to do here.
>
> M
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> >> From: Andy Lutomirski
>> >>
>> >> Fixes an easy DoS and possi
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree. Crap.
>
> I assume that if there is a maintainer who normally sends me stuff by
> git, when I see patches in emails they ar
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> >> From: Andy Lutomirski
>> >>
>> >> Fixes an easy DoS and possi
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Hmm. It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree. Crap.
I assume that if there is a maintainer who normally sends me stuff by
git, when I see patches in emails they are just informational
heads-ups about stuff that is being discuss
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> >> From: Andy Lutomirski
> >>
> >> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
> >>
> >> This does nothing
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> From: Andy Lutomirski
>>
>> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
>>
>> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
>>
>> eparis: If the admin has enabled
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski
>
> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
>
> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
>
> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
> rules. Th
From: Andy Lutomirski
Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
rules. This bug has been around since before git. Wow...
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel
21 matches
Mail list logo
