Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-12 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:17:28AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Looks good to me, but I have not looked very deeply ... > > > > I sent out a v2 with the co-author information moved from the > > signoffs to the commit message. If it looks reasonable to you, can > > y

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-12 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Josh Triplett wrote: > > Looks good to me, but I have not looked very deeply ... > > I sent out a v2 with the co-author information moved from the > signoffs to the commit message. If it looks reasonable to you, can > you take it through the tip tree please? So since this is multi-arch, a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-12 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:56:58AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On Monday 11 May 2015 08:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:31:39PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> On Tuesday 21 April 2015 11:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> clone with CLONE_SETTLS accepts an argument to se

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Vineet Gupta
+CC Arnd, Al, linux-arch On Monday 11 May 2015 08:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:31:39PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> On Tuesday 21 April 2015 11:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: >>> clone with CLONE_SETTLS accepts an argument to set the thread-local >>> storage area for the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > On Tue

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:31:39PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On Tuesday 21 April 2015 11:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > clone with CLONE_SETTLS accepts an argument to set the thread-local > > storage area for the new thread. sys_clone declares an int argument > > tls_val in the appropriate poi

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Vineet Gupta
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 11:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > clone with CLONE_SETTLS accepts an argument to set the thread-local > storage area for the new thread. sys_clone declares an int argument > tls_val in the appropriate point in the argument list (based on the > various CLONE_BACKWARDS varian

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Tr

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > > > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Maci

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Macieira > > > > Can you please clarify that SOB chain? It does not make any se

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-05 Thread josh
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Macieira > > Can you please clarify that SOB chain? It does not make any sense. Co-authored patch. We both worked on it t

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-05-05 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > Signed-off-by: Thiago Macieira Can you please clarify that SOB chain? It does not make any sense. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a messa

[PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

2015-04-21 Thread Josh Triplett
clone with CLONE_SETTLS accepts an argument to set the thread-local storage area for the new thread. sys_clone declares an int argument tls_val in the appropriate point in the argument list (based on the various CLONE_BACKWARDS variants), but doesn't actually use or pass along that argument. Inst